Loading…
Dalton Schultz
TEHOU#86Active
77 · 242 lb · Age 30 · 9yr exp · Stanford
PPG
10.4
17 GP
TGT/G
6.2
19.1% share
REC/YD
82/777
FPTS
177.7
season
2025 Season Stats
PPR scoring| Season | GP | TGT | REC | YDS | TD | TGT% | YPRR | PPG | FPTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17 | 106 | 82 | 777 | 3 | 19.1% | – | 10.4 | 177.7 |
Advanced Metrics
YPRR
–
TGT%
19.1%
EPA/TGT
+0.35
TGT
106
Age CurvePeak age 27
TE · historical aging curveproduction index vs age
PRODUCTION INDEX
Schultz is producing above the age-30 TE baseline and sits 3 yrs past the historical TE peak.
TEHOUAge 30.1
Career phase
Early decline
Easing off peak — watch efficiency and snap-share retention.
Current age
30.1
Peak age · TE
27
Years past peak
−3
Output vs avg
+0 idx
Lifecycle map · TECurrent Age 30
Draft-eligible
Breakout
Peak
Prime decline
Veteran
Tail
1823283338
Aging curves are historical positional averages, not individual projections. Player points reflect real season production normalized to a positional index. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Touch & Opportunity FunnelVolume 95 pct
Opportunity funneltick = positional percentile
Elite volume, volume-built output
95 avg pct · FPAA +3.7
Snaps94 pct vs TE
893
52.5 / g
↓Tgt / snap 12%
Targets95 pct vs TE
106
6.2 / g
↓Catch rate 77%
Receptions97 pct vs TE
82
4.8 / g
↓Yds / rec 9.5
Receiving Yards95 pct vs TE
777
45.7 / g
Efficiency verdict · actual vs expected
Expected
174
10.2 / g
Actual
178
10.5 / g
FPAA · act − exp
+3.7
+0.2 / g
Schultz converts opportunity at about the expected rate — production is volume-built, with a slim +3.7-pt efficiency cushion.
TEHOU17 G
Opportunity vs efficiency
EFFICIENCYCOMPLETEAT-RISKVOLUME
← LOW OPPHIGH OPP →
Volume-driven
Tgt / G
6.2
Snaps / G
53
Exp Pts / G
10.2
FPAA / G
+0.2
Role trend · opp / wk→ steady
Weekly trace · opportunity vs actual pts
Bars — opportunityLine — actual pts
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Opportunity and expected points are derived from real weekly play data (snaps, targets, touches). Expected points model rush and receiving volume — not a projection. Percentiles are positional ranks, not composite ratings. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Range of Outcomes17 G · weekly PPR
Expected weekly rangep20 – p80 of game scores
Floor
5.3
27th vs TE
Median
11.0
10.5 avg
Ceiling
14.3
12th vs TE
low 1.8high 21.6
Balanced profile
Middle-of-pack volatility for a TE — 18% boom / 18% bust weeks, steadier than 67% of peers.
TEHOU13 TE pool
Steadiness vs TEBalanced
Steadier than 67% of qualified TEs
Boom rate
18%
weeks ≥ 15
Bust rate
18%
weeks ≤ 5
Weekly distribution · PPR by game
boom ≥ 15bust ≤ 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Floor / median / ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentiles of the player's real weekly PPR scores (2025, ≥12 games). Percentiles and steadiness are ranks within the position. Boom/bust use position-standard weekly thresholds. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Full Analysis
Sign in for the full readTape Room
Advanced route analysis, snap-share trends, and usage patterns.
Projections
Week-by-week fantasy point projections with scenario modeling.
Matchup Grade
Opponent-specific coverage matchup grades and historical splits.
Injury History
Full injury timeline, body-part breakdown, and return patterns.
Dynasty Value
Dynasty Value score, buy/sell signal, and long-term outlook.
Analyst Read
AI-powered one-page read: role, trend, risk, and verdict.
3 full profiles free. No card required.
Get full access to Tape Room, projections, matchup grades, trade value, injury history, and the AI analyst read for Dalton Schultz and every other player in the database.
Sign in free3 free profiles · No credit card · Cancel anytime