RB · historical aging curveproduction index vs age
PRODUCTION INDEX
Pollard is producing above the age-29 RB baseline and sits 5 yrs past the historical RB peak.
RBTENAge 29.3
Career phase
Late decline
Sustained decay vs the positional baseline — replacement risk elevated.
Current age
29.3
Peak age · RB
24
Years past peak
−5
Output vs avg
+32 idx
Lifecycle map · RBCurrent Age 29
Draft-eligible
Breakout
Peak
Prime decline
Veteran
Tail
1823283338
Aging curves are historical positional averages, not individual projections. Player points reflect real season production normalized to a positional index. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Touch & Opportunity FunnelVolume 88 pct
Opportunity funneltick = positional percentile
Elite volume, efficiency leak
88 avg pct · FPAA −3.1
Snaps88 pct vs RB
657
38.6 / g
↓Opp / snap 43%
Opportunities88 pct vs RB
283
16.6 / g
↓Touch rate 97%
Touches88 pct vs RB
275
16.2 / g
↓Yds / touch 4.7
Total Yards86 pct vs RB
1,288
75.8 / g
Efficiency verdict · actual vs expected
Expected
195
11.5 / g
→
Actual
192
11.3 / g
FPAA · act − exp
−3.1
−0.2 / g
Pollard is leaving points on the table: actual trails expected by 3.1 pts (≈ −0.2/g). The opportunity is there; the efficiency is the leak.
RBTEN17 G
Opportunity vs efficiency
EFFICIENCYCOMPLETEAT-RISKVOLUME
← LOW OPPHIGH OPP →
Efficiency leak
Opp / G
16.6
Snaps / G
39
Exp Pts / G
11.5
FPAA / G
−0.2
Role trend · opp / wk→ steady
Weekly trace · opportunity vs actual pts
Bars — opportunityLine — actual pts
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Opportunity and expected points are derived from real weekly play data (snaps, targets, touches). Expected points model rush and receiving volume — not a projection. Percentiles are positional ranks, not composite ratings. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Range of Outcomes17 G · weekly PPR
Expected weekly rangep20 – p80 of game scores
Floor
6.9
39th vs RB
Median
9.5
10.9 avg
Ceiling
13.5
2nd vs RB
low 5.3high 28.1
Balanced profile
Middle-of-pack volatility for a RB — 6% boom / 35% bust weeks, steadier than 62% of peers.
RBTEN27 RB pool
Steadiness vs RBBalanced
Steadier than 62% of qualified RBs
Boom rate
6%
weeks ≥ 20
Bust rate
35%
weeks ≤ 8
Weekly distribution · PPR by game
boom ≥ 20bust ≤ 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Floor / median / ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentiles of the player's real weekly PPR scores (2025, ≥12 games). Percentiles and steadiness are ranks within the position. Boom/bust use position-standard weekly thresholds. Research only — not investment or wagering advice.
Full Analysis
Sign in for the full read
Tape Room
Tape Room
Advanced route analysis, snap-share trends, and usage patterns.
Get full access to Tape Room, projections, matchup grades, trade value, injury history, and the AI analyst read for Tony Pollard and every other player in the database.